Teamwork vs Wrike: Which Is Better in 2026?

A detailed comparison to help you choose the right project management tool for your needs.

Too Close to Call

Both tools are closely matched with similar overall ratings

Quick Comparison

Aspect
T
Teamwork
W
Wrike
Overall Rating
8/10
8/10
Starting Price
$5.99/mo
$9.8/mo
Free Plan
Free Trial
Best For
medium
large
Ease of Use
8/10
7/10
Features
8/10
9/10
Value for Money
8/10
7/10
Support
8/10
8/10

Overview

Teamwork is designed specifically for agencies and client services teams, with built-in time tracking, billing, and client collaboration features.

Wrike is an enterprise-grade work management platform with powerful features for resource management, proofing, and cross-team visibility.

Pricing Comparison

Better value: Teamwork
T

Teamwork

Better Value
Pricing ModelFreemium
Starting Price$5.99/mo
Free Trial
Free Tier
W

Wrike

Pricing ModelFreemium
Starting Price$9.8/mo
Free Trial
Free Tier

Features Comparison

FeatureTeamworkWrike
Kanban Boards
Gantt Charts
Time Tracking
Resource Management
Custom Fields
Automation
Mobile App
Api Access
Guest Access
Max Users
Unlimited
Unlimited

0

features unique to Teamwork

0

features unique to Wrike

Pros & Cons

T

Teamwork

Pros

  • Built-in time tracking and billing
  • Excellent client portal features
  • Good value for agencies
  • Solid Gantt and workload views
  • Free tier available

Cons

  • UI less modern than competitors
  • Mobile app needs improvement
  • Some features require add-ons
  • Limited automation capabilities
W

Wrike

Pros

  • Powerful resource management
  • Advanced proofing and approval workflows
  • Excellent reporting and analytics
  • Strong security and compliance
  • Cross-tagging for project visibility

Cons

  • Steeper learning curve
  • Interface can feel dated
  • Complex pricing structure
  • Overkill for small teams

The Verdict: It's a Tie

Both Teamwork and Wrike are excellent project management tools that deliver strong value. With nearly identical overall ratings, the choice between them comes down to your specific requirements rather than one being objectively better.

Teamwork shines in digital agencies, while Wrike excels at enterprise marketing teams. Consider trying both with their free trials to see which fits your workflow better.

Our recommendation: We recommend Teamwork if you prioritize built-in time tracking and billing, and Wrike if powerful resource management matter more to you.

Choose Teamwork if you...

  • • Need digital agencies
  • • Need consultancies
  • • Need teams billing by hour

Choose Wrike if you...

  • • Need enterprise marketing teams
  • • Need professional services firms
  • • Need teams needing resource planning

Ready to Get Started?

* We may earn an affiliate commission when you visit these tools through our links. This doesn't affect our ratings or comparisons.

Teamwork vs Wrike FAQ

Both Teamwork and Wrike are excellent choices with similar ratings. The better option depends on your specific requirements and preferences.
Yes, Teamwork is more affordable with plans starting at $5.99/month, compared to $9.8/month for the other.
Teamwork scores higher in ease of use (8/10) compared to Wrike (7/10).
Yes, migration between Teamwork and Wrike is possible. Most tools offer data export features. Check each tool's documentation for specific migration guides and import capabilities.
Both tools can work for small teams. Teamwork is best for medium teams while Wrike suits large teams.
For startups, consider your growth trajectory. Teamwork offers a free tier which is great for bootstrapped startups.
Yes, each tool has unique strengths. Teamwork excels at: Digital agencies, Consultancies. Wrike is better for: Enterprise marketing teams, Professional services firms. Review our detailed feature comparison above.
Both tools have similar support ratings at 8/10.
Teamwork offers better value for money with a rating of 8/10 compared to Wrike's 7/10.
Consider switching if Wrike's strengths (Enterprise marketing teams) align better with your current needs. However, factor in migration effort and learning curve before making the switch.