Close vs Copper: Which Is Better in 2026?

A detailed comparison to help you choose the right crm & sales tool for your needs.

Our Pick: Close (by a slight margin)

Close edges out with a slightly higher rating (8 vs 7.5)

Quick Comparison

Aspect
C
Close(Winner)
C
Copper
Overall Rating
8/10
7.5/10
Starting Price
$49/mo
$23/mo
Free Plan
Free Trial
Best For
small
small
Ease of Use
8/10
9/10
Features
8/10
7/10
Value for Money
7/10
7/10
Support
9/10
8/10

Overview

Close is a sales engagement CRM with powerful calling, email sequences, and pipeline management. Designed for inside sales teams focused on outbound.

Copper (formerly ProsperWorks) is the CRM built specifically for Google Workspace users. Lives inside Gmail and integrates deeply with Google apps.

Pricing Comparison

Better value: Copper
C

Close

Pricing ModelPaid
Starting Price$49/mo
Free Trial
Free Tier
C

Copper

Better Value
Pricing ModelPaid
Starting Price$23/mo
Free Trial
Free Tier

Features Comparison

Winner: Close
FeatureCloseCopper
Contact Management
Deal Pipeline
Email Tracking
Email Templates
Sales Automation
Basic
Reporting
Mobile App
Api Access
Lead Scoring
Telephony

1

features unique to Close

0

features unique to Copper

Pros & Cons

C

Close

Pros

  • Best-in-class built-in calling
  • Powerful email sequences
  • Fast, responsive interface
  • Excellent for outbound sales
  • Great customer support

Cons

  • Higher starting price
  • Limited marketing features
  • Fewer integrations than others
  • Not ideal for inbound-focused teams
C

Copper

Pros

  • Best Google Workspace integration
  • Works directly in Gmail
  • Automatic contact enrichment
  • Very easy to adopt
  • Clean, simple interface

Cons

  • Only valuable if using Google Workspace
  • Limited advanced features
  • Pricing higher for what you get
  • Less powerful automation

The Verdict: Close Edges Out

This was a close comparison, but Close edges out Copper with a slightly higher overall rating of 8/10 versus 7.5/10. Both are solid choices, but Close offers a marginally better overall package.

Close's advantages include Best-in-class built-in calling and Powerful email sequences, though Copper counters with Best Google Workspace integration and Works directly in Gmail.

Our recommendation: We give the slight edge to Close, but don't count out Copper if its specific strengths align better with your needs.

Choose Close if you...

  • • Need outbound sales teams
  • • Need startups doing cold outreach
  • • Need inside sales organizations

Choose Copper if you...

  • • Need teams fully on google workspace
  • • Need relationship-based businesses
  • • Need teams wanting minimal crm friction

Ready to Get Started?

* We may earn an affiliate commission when you visit these tools through our links. This doesn't affect our ratings or comparisons.

Close vs Copper FAQ

Based on our evaluation, Close has a slight edge with an overall rating of 8/10. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs and use case.
Yes, Copper is more affordable with plans starting at $23/month, compared to $49/month for the other.
Copper scores higher in ease of use (9/10) compared to Close (8/10).
Yes, migration between Close and Copper is possible. Most tools offer data export features. Check each tool's documentation for specific migration guides and import capabilities.
For small teams, Close is specifically designed for this use case. Consider your budget and specific feature needs when choosing.
For startups, consider your growth trajectory. Both tools require paid plans, so factor pricing into your runway calculations.
Yes, each tool has unique strengths. Close excels at: Outbound sales teams, Startups doing cold outreach. Copper is better for: Teams fully on Google Workspace, Relationship-based businesses. Review our detailed feature comparison above.
Close rates higher in customer support (9/10) compared to Copper (8/10).
Both tools offer similar value for money, each rated 7/10.
Consider switching if Copper's strengths (Teams fully on Google Workspace) align better with your current needs. However, factor in migration effort and learning curve before making the switch.