Mixpanel vs PostHog: Which Is Better in 2026?

A detailed comparison to help you choose the right analytics tool for your needs.

Our Pick: PostHog (by a slight margin)

PostHog edges out with a slightly higher rating (8.5 vs 8)

Quick Comparison

Aspect
M
Mixpanel
P
PostHog(Winner)
Overall Rating
8/10
8.5/10
Starting Price
$20/mo
Free
Free Plan
Free Trial
Best For
medium
medium
Ease of Use
7/10
7/10
Features
9/10
9/10
Value for Money
7/10
10/10
Support
7/10
7/10

Overview

Mixpanel is a leading product analytics platform for tracking user behavior, funnels, and retention. Excellent for product teams wanting to understand user journeys.

PostHog is an open-source product analytics suite with event tracking, session recording, feature flags, and A/B testing. Can be self-hosted for full data control.

Pricing Comparison

Better value: PostHog
M

Mixpanel

Pricing ModelFreemium
Starting Price$20/mo
Free Trial
Free Tier
P

PostHog

Better Value
Pricing ModelFreemium
Starting PriceFree
Free Trial
Free Tier

Features Comparison

Winner: PostHog
FeatureMixpanelPostHog
Web Analytics
Product Analytics
Heatmaps
Session Recording
Funnel Analysis
Privacy Focused
Self-host option
Real Time
Ab Testing
Data Retention
Varies by plan
Configurable
Custom Events

0

features unique to Mixpanel

2

features unique to PostHog

Pros & Cons

M

Mixpanel

Pros

  • Powerful event tracking
  • Excellent funnel and retention analysis
  • User-level insights
  • Good free tier
  • Strong cohort analysis

Cons

  • Learning curve for full potential
  • Can get expensive at scale
  • Implementation requires planning
  • Not for simple web analytics
P

PostHog

Pros

  • Generous free tier
  • Open source, can self-host
  • All-in-one product analytics
  • Feature flags included
  • Session recording free

Cons

  • Self-hosting requires DevOps
  • UI not as polished
  • Can be complex to set up
  • Newer platform

The Verdict: PostHog Edges Out

This was a close comparison, but PostHog edges out Mixpanel with a slightly higher overall rating of 8.5/10 versus 8/10. Both are solid choices, but PostHog offers a marginally better overall package.

PostHog's advantages include Generous free tier and Open source, can self-host, though Mixpanel counters with Powerful event tracking and Excellent funnel and retention analysis.

Our recommendation: We give the slight edge to PostHog, but don't count out Mixpanel if its specific strengths align better with your needs.

Choose Mixpanel if you...

  • • Need saas product teams
  • • Need mobile apps
  • • Need user behavior analysis

Choose PostHog if you...

  • • Need startups wanting free analytics
  • • Need teams wanting data ownership
  • • Need product-led companies

Ready to Get Started?

* We may earn an affiliate commission when you visit these tools through our links. This doesn't affect our ratings or comparisons.

Mixpanel vs PostHog FAQ

Based on our evaluation, PostHog has a slight edge with an overall rating of 8.5/10. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs and use case.
Yes, PostHog is more affordable with plans starting at $0/month, compared to $20/month for the other.
Both tools have similar ease of use ratings at 7/10.
Yes, migration between Mixpanel and PostHog is possible. Most tools offer data export features. Check each tool's documentation for specific migration guides and import capabilities.
Both tools can work for small teams. Mixpanel is best for medium teams while PostHog suits medium teams.
For startups, consider your growth trajectory. Mixpanel offers a free tier which is great for bootstrapped startups.
Yes, each tool has unique strengths. Mixpanel excels at: SaaS product teams, Mobile apps. PostHog is better for: Startups wanting free analytics, Teams wanting data ownership. Review our detailed feature comparison above.
Both tools have similar support ratings at 7/10.
PostHog offers better value for money with a rating of 10/10 compared to Mixpanel's 7/10.
Consider switching if PostHog's strengths (Startups wanting free analytics) align better with your current needs. However, factor in migration effort and learning curve before making the switch.