Hotjar vs Matomo: Which Is Better in 2026?

A detailed comparison to help you choose the right analytics tool for your needs.

Our Pick: Hotjar (by a slight margin)

Hotjar edges out with a slightly higher rating (8 vs 7.5)

Quick Comparison

Aspect
H
Hotjar(Winner)
M
Matomo
Overall Rating
8/10
7.5/10
Starting Price
$32/mo
$19/mo
Free Plan
Free Trial
Best For
small
medium
Ease of Use
9/10
6/10
Features
8/10
8/10
Value for Money
7/10
8/10
Support
8/10
7/10

Overview

Hotjar combines heatmaps, session recordings, and feedback tools to show how users interact with your website. Great for UX insights and conversion optimization.

Matomo (formerly Piwik) is an open-source analytics platform that can be self-hosted. Full Google Analytics replacement with complete data ownership.

Pricing Comparison

Better value: Matomo
H

Hotjar

Pricing ModelFreemium
Starting Price$32/mo
Free Trial
Free Tier
M

Matomo

Better Value
Pricing ModelFreemium
Starting Price$19/mo
Free Trial
Free Tier

Features Comparison

Winner: Matomo
FeatureHotjarMatomo
Web Analytics
Basic
Product Analytics
Limited
Heatmaps
Session Recording
Funnel Analysis
Privacy Focused
Real Time
Ab Testing
Data Retention
365 days
Unlimited (self-host)
Custom Events

0

features unique to Hotjar

2

features unique to Matomo

Pros & Cons

H

Hotjar

Pros

  • Visual heatmaps and recordings
  • Easy to understand insights
  • User feedback tools
  • Free tier available
  • Quick to implement

Cons

  • Recording limits on lower plans
  • Can slow down site slightly
  • Privacy considerations
  • Limited quantitative analytics
M

Matomo

Pros

  • 100% data ownership
  • GDPR compliant
  • Similar to Google Analytics
  • Free self-hosted option
  • No data sampling

Cons

  • Self-hosting requires technical skills
  • Interface feels dated
  • Cloud version gets expensive
  • Steeper learning curve

The Verdict: Hotjar Edges Out

This was a close comparison, but Hotjar edges out Matomo with a slightly higher overall rating of 8/10 versus 7.5/10. Both are solid choices, but Hotjar offers a marginally better overall package.

Hotjar's advantages include Visual heatmaps and recordings and Easy to understand insights, though Matomo counters with 100% data ownership and GDPR compliant.

Our recommendation: We give the slight edge to Hotjar, but don't count out Matomo if its specific strengths align better with your needs.

Choose Hotjar if you...

  • • Need ux research and optimization
  • • Need conversion rate optimization
  • • Need understanding user behavior visually

Choose Matomo if you...

  • • Need organizations needing data ownership
  • • Need government and healthcare
  • • Need privacy-conscious enterprises

Ready to Get Started?

* We may earn an affiliate commission when you visit these tools through our links. This doesn't affect our ratings or comparisons.

Hotjar vs Matomo FAQ

Based on our evaluation, Hotjar has a slight edge with an overall rating of 8/10. However, the best choice depends on your specific needs and use case.
Yes, Matomo is more affordable with plans starting at $19/month, compared to $32/month for the other.
Hotjar scores higher in ease of use (9/10) compared to Matomo (6/10).
Yes, migration between Hotjar and Matomo is possible. Most tools offer data export features. Check each tool's documentation for specific migration guides and import capabilities.
For small teams, Hotjar is specifically designed for this use case. Consider your budget and specific feature needs when choosing.
For startups, consider your growth trajectory. Hotjar offers a free tier which is great for bootstrapped startups.
Yes, each tool has unique strengths. Hotjar excels at: UX research and optimization, Conversion rate optimization. Matomo is better for: Organizations needing data ownership, Government and healthcare. Review our detailed feature comparison above.
Hotjar rates higher in customer support (8/10) compared to Matomo (7/10).
Matomo offers better value for money with a rating of 8/10 compared to Hotjar's 7/10.
Consider switching if Matomo's strengths (Organizations needing data ownership) align better with your current needs. However, factor in migration effort and learning curve before making the switch.